Gunnison Republican Caucus meeting Minutes

February 7, 2012

1. Welcome by Chairman Scott Rennick

2. Pledge of Allegiance led by Ethan Buckley

                  Pastor House gave a prayer

                  Review of handed out paper to each precinct table

3. Elect 2 Committee Persons per precinct

4. Rikki Santarelli speaks on procedure

                  1. Choose precinct committee people who will meet to campaign for Republican candidates.

                  2. Choose delegates to County Assembly- March 14

                  3. Participate in Presidential Preference Poll

5. Choose delegates for precincts

6. Collection of Precinct Elections Summary

7. David Justice spoke for Ron Paul

8. Pat Mckee spoke for Rick Santorum

9. Poll vote

              Scott Rennick spoke on behalf of Brian Davidson, CU Regent; Scott Tipton, State Congressman; & Debra Irvine, House of Representitives.

              Stu Fergeson running for County Commissioner of District 1 spoke.

              David Justice running for House District 61 spoke.

              Paulwayne Foreman running for County Commissioner  District 2 spoke.

              Warren Wilcox running for County Commissioner  District 2 spoke.

10. Annoucement of voting Results:

Rick Santorum: 50

Ron Paul: 49

Mitt Romney: 31

Newt Gingrich: 15

Rick Perry: 1

Michele Bachmann: 1

John Huntsman: 0

11. Submission of Resolutions from the floor:

          Jason Owen-Alternative Energy Resolution

          David Justice-State Bank Resolution

          Myron Ham-Resolution to Oppose All Gun-control Laws

          Tyler Stegenga- Resolution for Private Property Protection Council

          Eric Ferchout- Resolution of Colorado Education Funds

Last day to submit resolutions is March 9th

Regular GCRCC meetings 1st Saturday of the month at Almont Resort; 8:30 a.m.

LDD is going to be held March 23 at 6:30; location to be decided.

 County Assembly held March 14th at Webster Hall.

Welcome To the Gunnison County Republican Central Committee Website

As the Grand Ole Party we stand as a group of concerned citizens involved in Local, State, and National political issues. Our local Gunnison County Republican Central Committee (GCRCC) exists to support chosen Republican candidates through development, fund raising, voter awareness, voter registration, and election supervision.

Pre-registar for the February 7th Caucus on December 16th

Cloward-Piven Paradise Now?

By Jeannie DeAngelis

 Combine class warfare, demonizing the rich, getting as many people onto the welfare rolls as possible, and pushing the economic system to collapse and you have a flawless formula for Cloward-Piven 2.0 — and a vehicle that ensures Obama remains in power.

 

Cloward-Piven is a much talked-about strategy proposed in the mid-1960′s by two Columbia University sociology professors named Richard Andrew Cloward and Frances Fox Piven.  The Cloward-Piven approach was sometimes referred to as the “crisis strategy,” which they believed were a means to “end poverty.”

The premise of the Cloward-Piven collective/anti-capitalist gospel decried “individual mobility and achievement,” celebrated organized labor, fostered the principle that “if each finally found himself in the same relative economic relationship to his fellows … all were infinitely better off.”

The duo taught that if you flooded the welfare rolls and bankrupted the cities and ultimately the nation, it would foster economic collapse, which would lead to political turmoil so severe that socialism would be accepted as a fix to an out-of-control set of circumstances.

The idea was that if people were starving and the only way to eat was to accept government cheese, rather than starve, the masses would agree to what they would otherwise reject.  In essence, for the socialist-minded, the Cloward-Piven strategy is a simple formula that makes perfect sense; the radical husband-and-wife team had Saul Alinsky as their muse, and they went on to teach his social action principles to a cadre of socialist-leaning community organizers, one of whom was Barack Obama.

As the debt crisis continues to worsen, President Obama stands idly by an inferno with his arms crossed, shaking his head, and doing nothing other than kinking the fire hose and closing the spigot.  Spectator Obama is complaining that the structure of the American economy is engulfed in flames while accusing the Congress, which is trying desperately to douse the fire, of doing nothing about the problem.

Although speculative, if the Cloward-Piven strategy is the basis of the left’s game plan, spearheaded by Alinsky devotee Barack Obama, it certainly explains the President’s inaction and detached attitude.

The greatest nation in the history of the world is teetering on the brink of a catastrophic economic crisis. America was pushed to this point by a rapidly-expanding national debt and a stressed-out entitlement system; in the center of this crisis is the President, who insists on expanding it even further, all in the name “fairness” and “social justice.”

As a default date nears and the President threatens seniors that there’s a chance they may not receive their Social Security checks, it has been revealed that the federal government disperses a stunning 80 million checks a month, which means that about a third of the US adult population could be receiving some sort of entitlement.

Since the 1960′s when Cloward-Piven presented a socialistic guideline to usher in the type of evenhandedness Obama lauds, America’s entitlement rolls have swelled from eight million to 80 million.  If the nation’s ability to disperse handouts were ever disrupted, it’s not hard to see how chaos would erupt should an angry army of millions demand what Cloward-Piven called “the right to income.”

Couple the threat of dried-up funds for food stamps, Social Security, unemployment benefits and the like with the Obama administration’s vigorous campaign to turn a tiny upper class of big earners into the enemy, and you have the Cloward-Piven recipe for anarchy and complete collapse.

If the worst happened, Saul Alinsky’s biggest fan, whose poll numbers continue to plummet, could use mayhem in the streets to remain firmly ensconced in the White House.  Alinsky taught his students a basic principle that community organizer Barack Obama learned well: “Never let a good crisis go to waste.” Fiscal disintegration coupled with lawlessness would deliver the type of Cloward-Piven/Saul Alinsky trifecta that progressives have worked toward and waited decades for.

Barack Obama has spent the last 1,000+ days defying reason and choosing policy directions that seem nonsensical to the rational mind: a failed stimulus package; ObamaCare; growing the deficit to astronomical proportions; and cynically portraying wealth as immoral. Now, when cuts are the only fix to a budgetary balloon about to burst, a seemingly illogical President digs in and demands additional phantom dollars to spend on a system that is collapsing under the weight of unmanageable debt.

It’s hard to figure out the method to the President’s obvious madness, because based on Obama’s approval rating, if the election were held today even Pee Wee Herman could replace Obama behind the Resolute Desk.  Maybe the “method” isn’t “mad” in the least!

Could it be that Barack Obama is purposely pressuring the system in a premeditated effort to foster a major crisis?   One that would demand extraordinary measures to control by a President who could then mete out basic sustenance to Americans who would agree to anything to regain some sense of normalcy.  And in the process successfully usher in the “socially just” system Barack Obama has dreamed of all his life.

While radical Alinsky/Cloward-Piven disciple Obama appears to be clueless and detached, it may be a ploy; he may actually be focused and engaged as he purposely pursues an Alinsky-inspired course of action to force the system to “live up” to its own rules.  Obama’s ultimate goal of once-and-for-all discrediting the capitalist system and replacing America’s foundational economic and social tenets with a broad-based socialist one headed by progressive Marxists like himself, is actually within reach.

As Obama pushes and prods the US economy and instigates social unrest, it could be that he believes a Cloward-Piven-style utopia resides just beyond the horizon — a progressive panacea where an election-free, classless society, thankful for a simple crust of bread, looks to Barack Obama to keep the peace by remaining in power indefinitely.

Therefore, unless all of America, regardless of class or political persuasion, pays attention to the potential for a bleak future that lies ahead and realizes the President’s non-plan could be itself an actual calculated plan, the resulting consequences will affect everyone, as Barack Obama transforms a once great nation into Cloward and Piven’s idea of paradise.

IMPORTANT WEB SITE LINKS…TAKE TIME TO VIEW THESE SITES!

Colorado Republicans web site:

http://www.cologop.org/

Congressman Scott Tipton

http://tipton.house.gov/

John Suthers:  fighting Obamacare

http://www.coloradoattorneygeneral.gov/

Speaker of the House McNulty on re-districting:

http://www.coloradohousegop.com/page6/page6.php

Coloradore-districting:

http://www.colorado.gov/cs/Satellite/CGA-ReDistrict/CBON/1251581769173

http://coloradostatesman.com/kopel/99880-census-decides-colorado%3Fs-political-future

ColoradoStatesman Publication:

http://coloradostatesman.com/index.php

RALLY WITH THE GOP! SUNDAY, 9/12/10

SAVE THE DATE for the Gunnison County Republican “get out the vote rally!” Sunday, September 12th at the IOOF Park at the corner of Main St. and Virginia in downtown Gunnsion (next to Sugah’s Cafe). TIME: 3 – 5 PM Be sure to get out and meet the candidates, network with old and new friends and pick up some literature to help insure you are up on the issues prior to the election on November 3rd.

How Likely Is a Full Repeal of the New Health Care Law?

Article from www.AskHeritage.org Week of August 1, 2010

Last month at a town hall in Hayward, Calif., a constituent asked Rep. Pete Stark (D-CA) about Obamacare: “If this legislation is Constitutional, what limitations are there on the federal government’s ability to tell us how to run our private lives? … If they can do this, what can’t they?” Stark, a longtime advocate of government-run health care, gave an honest yet troubling answer: “The federal government can, yes, do most anything in this country.”

Yesterday a federal court in Virginia agreed with the logic, but not the Constitutional understanding, of Stark’s view of federal government power. In the first substantive legal ruling on President Barack Obama’s health regulation law, U.S. District Court Judge Henry Hudson held that the Commonwealth of Virginia raised a valid substantive theory to challenge Obamacare and that its democratically passed Virginia Health Care Freedom Act provided it standing to challenge the federal individual mandate. On the issue of that mandate, Hudson wrote: “Unquestionably, this regulation radically changes the landscape of health insurance coverage in America. … No reported case from any federal appellate court has extended the Commerce Clause or the Tax Clause to include the regulation of a person’s decision not to purchase a product, notwithstanding its effect on interstate commerce.”

Echoing the court’s ruling, Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli said: “This lawsuit is not about health care, it’s about our freedom and about standing up and calling on the federal government to follow the ultimate law of the land – the Constitution.” And it is becoming more and more clear that Obamacare makes it next to impossible for Americans to even track, let alone check, federal power. While the Joint Economic Committee released a report showing that the President’s health law created an impenetrable web of at least 47 new bureaucratic entities, a CRS report from earlier in the month drew an even starker conclusion: “The precise number of new entities that will ultimately be created pursuant to PPACA is currently unknowable.”

How are the American people supposed to check the power of the federal government if even the official research arm of Congress cannot keep track of all the bureaucracies Congress creates? It can’t. The CRS report goes on to say: “Under the new law, the Government Accountability Office must appoint at least 83 new members to six new boards. It is unclear how GAO will be able to independently audit these entities when the [Comptroller General] has appointed their members.” And the matters these new bureaucrats will be regulating are not minor. One such entity, the Independent Payment Advisory Board, is empowered to make Medicare payment policy, including which procedures (like mammograms) the federal government will or will not pay for. And the President insisted on making the IPAB’s decisions virtually impossible to overturn.

As long as President Obama is in the White House, full repeal of Obamacare is not possible. But its web of undemocratic, unaccountable bureaucracies can be defunded. And that is exactly what conservative candidates across the country are promising the American people they will do. This is a good first step, but it is not enough. The Obama administration will stop at nothing to protect the expansion of government. Just last week it wasted $700,000 of your tax dollars on a national cable television propaganda campaign promoting the President’s new law. In the ad, celebrity Andy Griffith tells American seniors that under Obamacare “like always, we’ll have our guaranteed [Medicare] benefits.” But as documented by FactCheck.org, “the truth is that the new law is guaranteed to result in benefit cuts” for the 10 million seniors currently enrolled in Medicare Advantage plans.

The American people are already fighting back against these tactics, and they are winning. In total, 33 states have mounted legal and legislative challenges to Obamacare. The American people are going to continue to fight this intolerable act in Congress, in the courts and in the states. It may take some time, but they are going to win.

What Does the Will of the American People Mean to the Obama Administration?

Article from www.askheritage.org August 7, 2010

This Tuesday voters in Missouri, by a 40-point margin, approved a ballot measure rejecting the individual mandate at the core of President Barack Obama’s health care law. Asked what the vote meant to the White House, press secretary Robert Gibbs said: “Nothing.” Yesterday in San Francisco, federal judge Vaughn Walker gave the exact same weight to a California ballot measure that affirmed marriage as an institution between one man and one woman. Specifically Judge Walker overturned the California Marriage Protection Act after concluding, as a matter of fact, that the majority of Californians who voted to protect marriage were bigots who had no rational basis to define marriage on their own terms. Here are just some of the “facts” Judge Walker found:

  • Religious beliefs that gay and lesbian relationships are sinful or inferior to heterosexual relationships harm gays and lesbians.
  • The campaign to pass Proposition 8 relied on stereotypes to show that same-sex relationships are inferior to opposite-sex relationships.
  • The Proposition 8 campaign relied on fears that children exposed to the concept of same-sex marriage may become gay or lesbian.
  • The genetic relationship between a parent and a child is not related to a child’s adjustment outcomes.
  • Children do not need to be raised by a male parent and a female parent to be well-adjusted.

How did Judge Walker arrive at these “facts”?  By agreeing with everything the same-sex marriage proponents “experts” said while ruling that the traditional marriage witness was “unreliable” and “provided no credible evidence to support any of the claimed adverse effects proponents promised to demonstrate.” In so doing, Walker not only ignored the views of millions of Californians, but by basing his decision on the 14th Amendment, he also ignored the factual determinations of every single popular vote that has been held on the issue in the past two decades. According to Judge Walker’s reasoning every single one of these Americans is a bigot whose opinion on marriage has no place under Judge Walker’s Constitution.

From the beginning, it was clear that Judge Walker was more interested in making a political statement than upholding the rule of law. That is why after Judge Walker ruled that the trial could be broadcast live the Supreme Court took the remarkable step of overturning his decision, writing in January: “Not only did [Judge Walker's court] ignore the federal statute that establishes the procedures by which its rules may be amended, its express purpose was to broadcast a high-profile trial that would include witness testimony about a contentious issue.”

Clearly that Supreme Court would have rightly viewed with great skepticicm every sentence of Judge Walker’s spurious ruling. But that Court will not be deciding this case. Today the Senate will vote on whether to confirm President Obama’s Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan. The same Elena Kagan who manipulated teh law and facts to deny military recruiters equal access to Harvard law students because she did not personally approve of our military’s personnel policies regarding same-sex relationships.

The facts are becoming quite clear. Kagan, Walker, Gibbs and Obama all give the same weight to the will of the American people as expressed at the ballot box: “Nothing.” We’ll see today if the Senate agrees.   (ADDED comment: Well, the Senate confirmed her! Look for a “list” of all Republican Senators who voted to approve her. If they are running for re-election, let’s hope they get caught up in the “out with the bad incumbent” bathwater!

Will the Obama Tax Hike Lead America Closer to a European Welfare State?

(article from AskHeritage.org) August 7, 2010

Last night, the Senate voted 61-39 in favor of a $26 billion bailout for states and government unions financed in part by an $11 billion tax hike that will kill American jobs at U.S. companies that compete overseas. Worse, before that final vote was taken, the Senate also defeated two amendments by Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC), both by 58-42 votes, that would have prevented the largest tax hike in American history. And earlier this month, Vice President Joe Biden told ABC News that the only thing wrong with President Barack Obama’s first $862 billion economic stimulus was that it didn’t borrow and spend enough.

The message to the U.S. economy’s job creators from this Administration and Congress is clear: You can expect higher spending, higher taxes and higher deficits for years to come. The verdict on this approach is in. Today the Labor Department’s Bureau of Labor and Statistics released its monthly jobs report showing the economy shed 131,000 jobs in July as 143,000 temporary census workers lost their government jobs. With the private sector only managing to add 71,000 jobs and averaging only 51,000 jobs over the past three months, the private economy appears stuck in first gear. Despite the job losses, the nation’s unemployment rate didn’t budge from 9.5% because another 181,000 discouraged workers left the workforce. All told the U.S. economy has now lost 2.4 million jobs since President Barack Obama signed his stimulus bill, and his administration is 7.6 million jobs short of what he promised the American economy would support by 2010.

Faced with this failure, the Obama administration wants to double down on its tax and spend policies by hiking taxes on America’s job creators. Research on the last seven recessions shows that small businesses generate about two out of every three new jobs during recoveries. But the $3.2 trillion Obama Tax Hike in January will hit these businesses the hardest. As Heritage Foundation analyst Curtis Dubay has detailed, while only eight percent of small businesses pay the highest two tax rates, those businesses earn 72 percent of all small business income and pay 82 percent of all income taxes paid by small businesses. According to a study by the American Family Business Foundation, just stopping President Obama’s Death Tax hike alone would create 1.5 million jobs.

But lower taxes and a more dynamic private sector is not the direction that President Obama wants to take the country. Obama’s economic direction is obviously not popular among conservatives, and is now becoming less and less popular among independents and liberals. As Slate columnist David Weigel told National Review’s Dan Foster this week: “It is like the biggest failing of Obama, and I keep saying this, that he just can’t be honest about the fact that he wants America to be more like Europe. Obviously he does.” We couldn’t agree more. For two generations after post-war reconstruction, Europe and America have pursued different economic models, and accordingly, moved in different economic directions. The American model was low tax, low spending and small government. It favored growth, income and vibrancy. The European model is high tax, high spending and big government. It favored fairness, equality and stability. It also featured unemployment rates double those of the United States, often hovering around 10 percent. Now that is no longer the case. Under Obama’s economic leadership, U.S. unemployment rates are surpassing Europe’s.

Commenting on President Obama’s budget, Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) told National Review Online: “This budget presents a choice of two futures. … This budget is about more than specific programs or policies. It is really about the American idea, and whether we want to move towards a European-style welfare state.” Allowing the Obama Tax Hikes to occur will be one huge step down that road. Is that really the choice Americans want to make?

GET EDUCATED!! Here are some web site resources!

Gunnison County GOP believes it is a right and a priviledge to vote in America. Make sure you know what you are voting for by doing some research. Here are some web sites to visit. If you have more online resources to share, please post them on the blog attached to this posting. NOW IS THE TIME FOR ALL GOOD MEN (AND WOMEN) TO COME TO THE AID OF THEIR COUNTRY!!

WWW.ASKHERITAGE.ORG (conservative think tank  watch dog on federal issues)

www.clearthebenchcolorado.org (information about the 4 seated Colorado State Superior Court judges (all liberal leaning democrats) who are and who have schemed to impose fees/taxes FROM THE BENCH! This usurps the General Assembly’s (Colorado House and Senate) authority and oversteps their responsibility to interpret law, not instigate it!

www.americansforprosperity.com Americans for Prosperity™ (AFP) and Americans for Prosperity Foundation (AFP Foundation) are committed to educating citizens about economic policy and mobilizing those citizens as advocates in the public policy process. AFP is an organization of grassroots leaders who engage citizens in the name of limited government and free markets on the local, state and federal levels. The grassroots activists of AFP advocate for public policies that champion the principles of entrepreneurship and fiscal and regulatory restraint.

www.cologop.org check out our team and click on 2010 candidates!

www.gunnisoncounty.org check out “your” county web site and all of the information available on it.

http://www.gunnisoncounty.org/commissioners_meetings.html At this section on the county web site, you will find the agendas and minutes from past Board of County Commissioner’s meetings (many of the meeting minutes are not posted?????). Maybe we need to ask for more transparency?

Gunnison County GOP Meeting and Rally Dates

SAVE THE DATE for our next Gunnison County Republican Committee meeting on Saturday, August 28th, 8:30 AM at the Almont Resort. Be sure to arrive a few minutes early if you plan on ordering breakfast and make sure you pay Harold before you leave!

SAVE THE DATE for the Gunnison County Republican “get out the vote rally!” Sunday, September 12th at the IOOF Park at the corner of Main St. and Virginia in downtown Gunnsion (next to Sugah’s Cafe). TIME: 3 – 5 PM  Be sure to get out and meet the candidates, network with old and new friends and pick up some literature to help insure you are up on the issues prior to the election on November 3rd.